About these crash totals
Counts come from NYC police crash reports (NYC Open Data). We sum all crashes, injuries, and deaths for this area across the selected time window shown on the card. Injury severity follows the official definitions in the NYPD dataset.
- Crashes: number of police‑reported collisions (all road users).
 - All injuries: total injured people in those crashes.
 - Moderate / Serious: subcategories reported by officers (e.g., broken bones vs. life‑threatening trauma).
 - Deaths: people who died due to a crash.
 
Notes: Police reports can be corrected after initial publication. Minor incidents without a police report are not included.
Close▸ Killed 5
▸ Crush Injuries 2
▸ Severe Bleeding 5
▸ Severe Lacerations 1
▸ Concussion 2
▸ Whiplash 25
▸ Contusion/Bruise 20
▸ Abrasion 13
▸ Pain/Nausea 9
About this chart
We group pedestrian injuries and deaths by the vehicle type that struck them (as recorded in police reports). Use the dropdown to view totals, serious injuries, or deaths.
- Trucks/Buses, SUVs/Cars, Mopeds, and Bikes reflect the reporting categories in the crash dataset.
 - Counts include people on foot only; crashes with no injured pedestrians are not shown here.
 
Notes: Police classification can change during investigations. Small categories may have year-to-year variance.
CloseAbout these numbers
These totals count vehicles with at least the shown number of camera‑issued speeding violations (school‑zone speed cameras) in any rolling 12‑month window in this district. Totals are summed from 2022 to the present for this geography.
- ≥ 6 (6+): advocates’ standard for repeat speeding offenders who should face escalating consequences.
 - ≥ 16 (16+): threshold in the current edited bill awaiting State Senate action.
 
About this list
This ranks vehicles by the number of NYC school‑zone speed‑camera violations they received in the last 12 months anywhere in the city. The smaller note shows how many times the same plate was caught in this area in the last 90 days.
Camera violations are issued by NYC DOT’s program. Counts reflect issued tickets and may omit dismissed or pending cases. Plate text is shown verbatim as recorded.
Close
Rego Park’s daily toll: bikes, bodies, and the boulevard
Rego Park: Jan 1, 2022 - Aug 24, 2025
Another driver. Same ending.
- In March, a 23-year-old bicyclist was killed at Queens Boulevard and 63rd Drive. The data lists “traffic control disregarded” and “driver inattention.” The rider died at the scene. The SUV and sedan had front-end damage. One man on a bike did not get up. NYC Open Data shows it as CrashID 4799953.
 - In April, a 55-year-old motorcyclist was killed at Woodhaven Boulevard and 60 Drive. Ejected. Apparent death. Three vehicles listed. CrashID 4803498 in city data.
 - In July, a 24-year-old motorcyclist died on the Long Island Expressway. Changing lanes. Ejected. Apparent death. Three vehicles. CrashID 4830329 in the same dataset.
 
The neighborhood count is blunt. Since 2022, Rego Park logged 826 crashes, 455 injuries, and 4 deaths. Pedestrians were hit mostly by sedans and SUVs. Bikes were hit too. That’s in the rollups in NYC Open Data.
Queens Boulevard remains a wound. It ranks near the top for injuries here. So does the LIE. Both show up in the small-area “top intersections” list pulled from city data.
“Two motorists were badly hurt and still have not fully recovered,” Queens DA Melinda Katz said after a wrong-way case on a Queens highway. The driver told police, “I entered the Clearview Expressway in the wrong direction because I wanted to hurt people and I felt ‘liberated’ by what I had done.” Those words live in the court record quoted by amNY.
Night after night
- Injuries stack up after dark. Midnight to 3 a.m. shows steady hurt. So do the rush hours at 8 a.m., 3 p.m., and 5 p.m. The hourly chart in the neighborhood data says so. It’s in the crash dataset.
 - “The driver sped off without stopping. No arrests have been made,” reporters wrote of a 2:30 a.m. hit-and-run near JFK. Not Rego Park, but Queens all the same. A 52‑year‑old man died. The words are from the Daily News and Gothamist, with time and location echoed by ABC7.
 
Three corners. One fix.
- Queens Boulevard at 63rd Drive. Woodhaven Boulevard at 60 Drive. The Long Island Expressway through Rego Park. They lead this map for harm. See the “top intersections” list in NYC Open Data.
 - The contributing factors repeat: inattention, failure to yield, disregarded signals. The small-geo breakdown shows them. The fixes are plain: daylighting and hardened turns at the boulevards; leading pedestrian intervals at the signals; targeted nighttime enforcement at repeat hotspots. These are the patterns in the dataset.
 
Officials know what works — do they?
- City Hall already has tools that slow cars and save lives. Albany passed measures to let NYC set safer speeds. Our own “Take Action” page lays it out and cites the law: drop the default speed to 20 mph and use it citywide. Cameras already run 24/7. The piece is here: Take Action.
 - The state is moving on the worst repeat speeders. The Senate bill S4045 advanced in June. It would force drivers with heavy points or camera tickets to install speed limiters. Sen. Joe Addabbo voted yes in committee, twice. See the votes in the Senate record.
 - Council Member Robert Holden co-sponsored a bill to yank city permits from drivers with obscured or defaced plates. That stops people from dodging cameras. It’s filed as Int 1358-2025.
 
The dead, the hurt, the pattern
- In this small patch, bikes and bodies keep meeting steel. Since 2022, one bicyclist killed. Three occupants killed. Eighty‑two pedestrians injured. That split is in the mode table from NYC Open Data.
 - The curve is bad this year. Crashes are up 31% over last year to date. Injuries up 68%. Three people dead versus none last year at this point. That’s the year‑to‑date comparison in the period stats derived from city data.
 
What now
- Slow every car. Lower the default speed to 20 mph and enforce it. Back the speed limiter bill for repeat offenders. Those two moves, together, cut the worst harm. Read the cases and call your officials: Take Action.
 
Citations
▸ Citations
- Motor Vehicle Collisions – Crashes (NYC Open Data) - Persons table, Vehicles table , NYC Open Data, Accessed 2025-08-24
 - Wrong-way driver rams cars on expressway, amny, Published 2025-08-15
 - Queens Hit-And-Run Kills Pedestrian Near JFK, NY Daily News, Published 2025-08-13
 - Hit-And-Run Kills Pedestrian Near JFK, Gothamist, Published 2025-08-13
 - Pedestrian Killed In JFK Hit-And-Run, ABC7, Published 2025-08-13
 - S4045 – Intelligent Speed Assistance devices for repeat offenders, Open States / NY Senate, Published 2025-06-11
 - Int 1358-2025 – Revoking city-issued permits for obscured/defaced plates, NYC Council – Legistar, Published 2025-08-14
 - Take Action: Slow the Speed, Stop the Carnage, CrashCount, Published 0001-01-01
 
Other Representatives

District 28
70-50 Austin St. Suite 114, Forest Hills, NY 11375
Room 626, Legislative Office Building, Albany, NY 12248
District 30
64-69 Dry Harbor Road, Middle Village, NY 11379
718-366-3900
250 Broadway, Suite 1558, New York, NY 10007
212-788-7381

District 15
66-85 73rd Place, Middle Village, NY 11379
Room 811, Legislative Office Building, Albany, NY 12247
▸ Other Geographies
Rego Park Rego Park sits in Queens, Precinct 112, District 30, AD 28, SD 15, Queens CB6.
▸ See also
Traffic Safety Timeline for Rego Park
16A 2299
Hevesi co-sponsors bill to boost street safety with speed limiters.▸Jan 16 - Assembly bill A 2299 targets reckless drivers. Eleven points or six camera tickets in a year triggers forced speed control tech. Lawmakers move to curb repeat speeders. Streets demand fewer deadly risks.
Assembly bill A 2299, now in sponsorship, sits with the New York State Assembly. Introduced January 16, 2025, the bill 'requires the installation of intelligent speed assistance devices if a driver accumulates eleven or more points on their driving record during a 24 month period, or receives 6 speed camera or red light camera tickets during a twelve month period.' Primary sponsor Emily Gallagher leads a bloc of co-sponsors, including Rebecca Seawright, Andrew Hevesi, and others. The measure aims to clamp down on repeat speeders with mandatory speed-limiting tech. No safety analyst note was provided.
- 
File A 2299,
Open States,
Published 2025-01-16
 
8A 1077
Hevesi co-sponsors bill boosting street safety for all users.▸Jan 8 - Assembly bill A 1077 pushes for streets built for people, not just cars. Dozens of lawmakers back safer roads. The bill stands at sponsorship. No vote yet. Vulnerable users wait for action.
Assembly bill A 1077, now in sponsorship, aims to 'enable safe access to public roads for all users by utilizing complete street design principles.' Introduced January 8, 2025, the bill sits in committee. Jonathan Rivera leads as primary sponsor, joined by over 60 co-sponsors including Patrick Burke, Robert C. Carroll, and Catalina Cruz. No votes have been cast. The bill's language centers all road users, not just drivers. No safety analyst has yet assessed its impact on vulnerable road users. The measure signals intent but action remains pending.
- 
File A 1077,
Open States,
Published 2025-01-08
 
8A 324
Hevesi co-sponsors bill to consider, not require, complete street design.▸Jan 8 - Assembly bill A 324 demands complete street design for state- and federally-funded projects. Sponsors push for public guidance. Streets built for people, not just cars. Safety for all hangs in the balance.
Assembly Bill A 324 was introduced on January 8, 2025, now in the sponsorship stage. The bill, titled 'Requires the consideration of complete street design for certain transportation projects which receive federal or state funding,' aims to force planners to consider all users—pedestrians, cyclists, drivers—when building or upgrading roads. Didi Barrett leads as primary sponsor, joined by Rebecca Seawright, Amy Paulin, and many others. The bill also directs the department to publish street design guidance. No safety analyst note yet, but the measure’s intent is clear: streets should protect the most vulnerable, not just move traffic.
- 
File A 324,
Open States,
Published 2025-01-08
 
5
Robert F Holden Criticizes Congestion Pricing Despite Safety Boost▸Jan 5 - Businesses in Manhattan’s toll zone pass new $9 congestion fee to customers. Councilman Holden calls it a scam tax. Residents pay even if they don’t drive. Gridlock grows near the border. Critics warn of rising costs and slower emergency response.
On January 5, 2025, New York City began enforcing congestion pricing below 60th Street, charging drivers $9 during peak hours. The measure, discussed in the article 'NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,' has sparked backlash. Queens Councilman Robert F. Holden, representing District 30, condemned the move, stating, 'It’s no surprise that businesses will pass the Congestion Scam Tax on to consumers.' Companies like CompuVoip and Dream Events & Decor now add surcharges for customers in the zone. Holden’s criticism joins that of Bronx Councilwoman Kristy Marmorato and others, who warn of higher costs and increased gridlock. Emergency unions claim response times will suffer. The bill’s impact on vulnerable road users was not assessed.
- 
NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,
nypost.com,
Published 2025-01-05
 
Jan 16 - Assembly bill A 2299 targets reckless drivers. Eleven points or six camera tickets in a year triggers forced speed control tech. Lawmakers move to curb repeat speeders. Streets demand fewer deadly risks.
Assembly bill A 2299, now in sponsorship, sits with the New York State Assembly. Introduced January 16, 2025, the bill 'requires the installation of intelligent speed assistance devices if a driver accumulates eleven or more points on their driving record during a 24 month period, or receives 6 speed camera or red light camera tickets during a twelve month period.' Primary sponsor Emily Gallagher leads a bloc of co-sponsors, including Rebecca Seawright, Andrew Hevesi, and others. The measure aims to clamp down on repeat speeders with mandatory speed-limiting tech. No safety analyst note was provided.
- File A 2299, Open States, Published 2025-01-16
 
8A 1077
Hevesi co-sponsors bill boosting street safety for all users.▸Jan 8 - Assembly bill A 1077 pushes for streets built for people, not just cars. Dozens of lawmakers back safer roads. The bill stands at sponsorship. No vote yet. Vulnerable users wait for action.
Assembly bill A 1077, now in sponsorship, aims to 'enable safe access to public roads for all users by utilizing complete street design principles.' Introduced January 8, 2025, the bill sits in committee. Jonathan Rivera leads as primary sponsor, joined by over 60 co-sponsors including Patrick Burke, Robert C. Carroll, and Catalina Cruz. No votes have been cast. The bill's language centers all road users, not just drivers. No safety analyst has yet assessed its impact on vulnerable road users. The measure signals intent but action remains pending.
- 
File A 1077,
Open States,
Published 2025-01-08
 
8A 324
Hevesi co-sponsors bill to consider, not require, complete street design.▸Jan 8 - Assembly bill A 324 demands complete street design for state- and federally-funded projects. Sponsors push for public guidance. Streets built for people, not just cars. Safety for all hangs in the balance.
Assembly Bill A 324 was introduced on January 8, 2025, now in the sponsorship stage. The bill, titled 'Requires the consideration of complete street design for certain transportation projects which receive federal or state funding,' aims to force planners to consider all users—pedestrians, cyclists, drivers—when building or upgrading roads. Didi Barrett leads as primary sponsor, joined by Rebecca Seawright, Amy Paulin, and many others. The bill also directs the department to publish street design guidance. No safety analyst note yet, but the measure’s intent is clear: streets should protect the most vulnerable, not just move traffic.
- 
File A 324,
Open States,
Published 2025-01-08
 
5
Robert F Holden Criticizes Congestion Pricing Despite Safety Boost▸Jan 5 - Businesses in Manhattan’s toll zone pass new $9 congestion fee to customers. Councilman Holden calls it a scam tax. Residents pay even if they don’t drive. Gridlock grows near the border. Critics warn of rising costs and slower emergency response.
On January 5, 2025, New York City began enforcing congestion pricing below 60th Street, charging drivers $9 during peak hours. The measure, discussed in the article 'NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,' has sparked backlash. Queens Councilman Robert F. Holden, representing District 30, condemned the move, stating, 'It’s no surprise that businesses will pass the Congestion Scam Tax on to consumers.' Companies like CompuVoip and Dream Events & Decor now add surcharges for customers in the zone. Holden’s criticism joins that of Bronx Councilwoman Kristy Marmorato and others, who warn of higher costs and increased gridlock. Emergency unions claim response times will suffer. The bill’s impact on vulnerable road users was not assessed.
- 
NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,
nypost.com,
Published 2025-01-05
 
Jan 8 - Assembly bill A 1077 pushes for streets built for people, not just cars. Dozens of lawmakers back safer roads. The bill stands at sponsorship. No vote yet. Vulnerable users wait for action.
Assembly bill A 1077, now in sponsorship, aims to 'enable safe access to public roads for all users by utilizing complete street design principles.' Introduced January 8, 2025, the bill sits in committee. Jonathan Rivera leads as primary sponsor, joined by over 60 co-sponsors including Patrick Burke, Robert C. Carroll, and Catalina Cruz. No votes have been cast. The bill's language centers all road users, not just drivers. No safety analyst has yet assessed its impact on vulnerable road users. The measure signals intent but action remains pending.
- File A 1077, Open States, Published 2025-01-08
 
8A 324
Hevesi co-sponsors bill to consider, not require, complete street design.▸Jan 8 - Assembly bill A 324 demands complete street design for state- and federally-funded projects. Sponsors push for public guidance. Streets built for people, not just cars. Safety for all hangs in the balance.
Assembly Bill A 324 was introduced on January 8, 2025, now in the sponsorship stage. The bill, titled 'Requires the consideration of complete street design for certain transportation projects which receive federal or state funding,' aims to force planners to consider all users—pedestrians, cyclists, drivers—when building or upgrading roads. Didi Barrett leads as primary sponsor, joined by Rebecca Seawright, Amy Paulin, and many others. The bill also directs the department to publish street design guidance. No safety analyst note yet, but the measure’s intent is clear: streets should protect the most vulnerable, not just move traffic.
- 
File A 324,
Open States,
Published 2025-01-08
 
5
Robert F Holden Criticizes Congestion Pricing Despite Safety Boost▸Jan 5 - Businesses in Manhattan’s toll zone pass new $9 congestion fee to customers. Councilman Holden calls it a scam tax. Residents pay even if they don’t drive. Gridlock grows near the border. Critics warn of rising costs and slower emergency response.
On January 5, 2025, New York City began enforcing congestion pricing below 60th Street, charging drivers $9 during peak hours. The measure, discussed in the article 'NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,' has sparked backlash. Queens Councilman Robert F. Holden, representing District 30, condemned the move, stating, 'It’s no surprise that businesses will pass the Congestion Scam Tax on to consumers.' Companies like CompuVoip and Dream Events & Decor now add surcharges for customers in the zone. Holden’s criticism joins that of Bronx Councilwoman Kristy Marmorato and others, who warn of higher costs and increased gridlock. Emergency unions claim response times will suffer. The bill’s impact on vulnerable road users was not assessed.
- 
NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,
nypost.com,
Published 2025-01-05
 
Jan 8 - Assembly bill A 324 demands complete street design for state- and federally-funded projects. Sponsors push for public guidance. Streets built for people, not just cars. Safety for all hangs in the balance.
Assembly Bill A 324 was introduced on January 8, 2025, now in the sponsorship stage. The bill, titled 'Requires the consideration of complete street design for certain transportation projects which receive federal or state funding,' aims to force planners to consider all users—pedestrians, cyclists, drivers—when building or upgrading roads. Didi Barrett leads as primary sponsor, joined by Rebecca Seawright, Amy Paulin, and many others. The bill also directs the department to publish street design guidance. No safety analyst note yet, but the measure’s intent is clear: streets should protect the most vulnerable, not just move traffic.
- File A 324, Open States, Published 2025-01-08
 
5
Robert F Holden Criticizes Congestion Pricing Despite Safety Boost▸Jan 5 - Businesses in Manhattan’s toll zone pass new $9 congestion fee to customers. Councilman Holden calls it a scam tax. Residents pay even if they don’t drive. Gridlock grows near the border. Critics warn of rising costs and slower emergency response.
On January 5, 2025, New York City began enforcing congestion pricing below 60th Street, charging drivers $9 during peak hours. The measure, discussed in the article 'NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,' has sparked backlash. Queens Councilman Robert F. Holden, representing District 30, condemned the move, stating, 'It’s no surprise that businesses will pass the Congestion Scam Tax on to consumers.' Companies like CompuVoip and Dream Events & Decor now add surcharges for customers in the zone. Holden’s criticism joins that of Bronx Councilwoman Kristy Marmorato and others, who warn of higher costs and increased gridlock. Emergency unions claim response times will suffer. The bill’s impact on vulnerable road users was not assessed.
- 
NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,
nypost.com,
Published 2025-01-05
 
Jan 5 - Businesses in Manhattan’s toll zone pass new $9 congestion fee to customers. Councilman Holden calls it a scam tax. Residents pay even if they don’t drive. Gridlock grows near the border. Critics warn of rising costs and slower emergency response.
On January 5, 2025, New York City began enforcing congestion pricing below 60th Street, charging drivers $9 during peak hours. The measure, discussed in the article 'NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’,' has sparked backlash. Queens Councilman Robert F. Holden, representing District 30, condemned the move, stating, 'It’s no surprise that businesses will pass the Congestion Scam Tax on to consumers.' Companies like CompuVoip and Dream Events & Decor now add surcharges for customers in the zone. Holden’s criticism joins that of Bronx Councilwoman Kristy Marmorato and others, who warn of higher costs and increased gridlock. Emergency unions claim response times will suffer. The bill’s impact on vulnerable road users was not assessed.
- NYC residents slapped with congestion pricing ‘surcharge’ by fed-up companies paying new toll: ‘Hochul inflation’, nypost.com, Published 2025-01-05