Crash Count for Fort Totten
Crashes: Collisions involving cars, bikes, and pedestrians. 6,578
All Injuries: Any injury from a reported crash. 3,091
Moderate: Broken bones, concussions, and other serious injuries. 717
Serious: Life-altering injuries: amputations, paralysis, severe trauma. 42
Deaths: Lives lost to traffic violence. 14
Data from Jan 1, 2022 to Nov 8, 2025
Carnage in NYC
Detailed breakdowns aren’t yet available for this year slice; totals below reflect the selected window.
Killed 6,933
+6,918
Crush Injuries 673
Lower leg/foot 185
+180
Whole body 142
+137
Head 117
+112
Back 58
+53
Neck 54
+49
Lower arm/hand 42
+37
Hip/upper leg 31
+26
Shoulder/upper arm 29
+24
Chest 22
+17
Face 22
+17
Abdomen/pelvis 14
+9
Amputation 51
Lower leg/foot 19
+14
Lower arm/hand 14
+9
Back 4
Shoulder/upper arm 3
Chest 2
Head 2
Hip/upper leg 2
Neck 2
Whole body 2
Severe Bleeding 768
Head 472
+467
Face 108
+103
Lower leg/foot 71
+66
Whole body 44
+39
Lower arm/hand 36
+31
Shoulder/upper arm 10
+5
Hip/upper leg 8
+3
Abdomen/pelvis 7
+2
Neck 6
+1
Eye 3
Back 2
Chest 2
Severe Lacerations 700
Head 249
+244
Lower leg/foot 177
+172
Face 97
+92
Whole body 64
+59
Lower arm/hand 62
+57
Hip/upper leg 24
+19
Shoulder/upper arm 10
+5
Neck 7
+2
Eye 6
+1
Back 5
Abdomen/pelvis 4
Chest 3
Concussion 1,158
Head 692
+687
Whole body 84
+79
Neck 83
+78
Lower leg/foot 82
+77
Back 65
+60
Face 39
+34
Shoulder/upper arm 37
+32
Lower arm/hand 35
+30
Chest 25
+20
Hip/upper leg 17
+12
Abdomen/pelvis 7
+2
Eye 3
Whiplash 6,280
Neck 2,819
+2,814
Back 1,379
+1,374
Head 1,197
+1,192
Whole body 595
+590
Shoulder/upper arm 302
+297
Chest 205
+200
Lower leg/foot 167
+162
Lower arm/hand 72
+67
Face 57
+52
Hip/upper leg 53
+48
Abdomen/pelvis 47
+42
Eye 6
+1
Contusion/Bruise 9,575
Lower leg/foot 3,314
+3,309
Head 1,521
+1,516
Lower arm/hand 1,293
+1,288
Shoulder/upper arm 819
+814
Back 652
+647
Hip/upper leg 610
+605
Whole body 463
+458
Face 455
+450
Neck 401
+396
Chest 236
+231
Abdomen/pelvis 169
+164
Eye 42
+37
Abrasion 6,429
Lower leg/foot 2,201
+2,196
Lower arm/hand 1,430
+1,425
Head 950
+945
Face 496
+491
Shoulder/upper arm 369
+364
Whole body 366
+361
Hip/upper leg 225
+220
Back 175
+170
Neck 161
+156
Abdomen/pelvis 81
+76
Chest 64
+59
Eye 35
+30
Pain/Nausea 2,746
Lower leg/foot 480
+475
Back 448
+443
Head 421
+416
Neck 408
+403
Whole body 372
+367
Shoulder/upper arm 279
+274
Lower arm/hand 168
+163
Hip/upper leg 144
+139
Chest 143
+138
Abdomen/pelvis 65
+60
Face 47
+42
Eye 6
+1
Data from Jan 1, 2022 to Nov 8, 2025

Who’s Injuring and Killing Pedestrians in NYC?

Fort Totten

Traffic Safety Timeline for Fort Totten

28
Driver Fatally Doors Cyclist in Queens Yet is Not Charged

21
Hit-run driver speeding to Dunkin’ Donuts when he killed Queens expressway construction worker: D.A.
20
Driver charged after woman directing traffic around expressway killed in Queens hit-and-run
18
Suspect who allegedly intentionally ran over, killed Queens teen is in the country illegally, ICE says
16
Man struck and killed by two vehicles while trying to cross Belt Parkway in South Ozone Park: NYPD
15
2 children struck by driver in Queens, suspect in custody, witnesses say
13
Teenage girl fatally struck by SUV in Queens, suspect in custody
5
Queens teen with autism fatally struck by car after going missing from LI school
2
Many Queens riders now navigating new commute, due to full redesign of MTA's bus network
1
MTA got busy with second phase of Queens bus network redesign this weekend
31
Second phase of Queens bus network redesign goes into effect
14
Int 1362-2025 Paladino Backs Misguided Removal of Protected Lane Definitions and Benchmarks

Aug 14 - Int 1362-2025 strips ‘protected’ bus and bicycle lane definitions and drops lane quotas from the Streets Master Plan. It tears out accountability. Transit priority and safe cycling face rollback. Pedestrians and riders lose clear targets.

"The definitions of protected bicycle lane and protected bus lane as set forth in subdivision a of section 19-199.1 of the administrative code of the city of New York are REPEALED." -- Vickie Paladino

Int 1362-2025 was introduced and sponsored by Council Member Vickie Paladino on August 14, 2025, and is in the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The matter is titled, "A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to removing benchmarks for bus lanes and bicycle lanes from the streets master plan and repealing certain definitions in relation thereto." Paladino is the sponsor. The bill repeals the definitions of "protected bicycle lane" and "protected bus lane" and removes lane benchmarks from the Streets Master Plan. Safety analysts say eliminating these definitions and quotas weakens commitments to high‑quality, traffic‑calming, mode‑shift infrastructure and is likely to reduce cycling uptake and bus priority, undermining safety‑in‑numbers and street equity. Status: in committee; no vote yet.


14
Int 1362-2025 Paladino Backs Misguided Repeal of Bus and Bike Benchmarks

Aug 14 - Int 1362-2025 strips protected bus and bike lane definitions and benchmarks. It removes firm targets and accountability. Safety analysts warn this will likely slow mode shift and increase crash exposure for cyclists and pedestrians.

"The definitions of protected bicycle lane and protected bus lane ... are REPEALED." -- Vickie Paladino

Int 1362-2025, introduced August 14, 2025, was sent to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and reached the Council vote stage. The matter is described as "removing benchmarks for bus lanes and bicycle lanes from the streets master plan." Council Member Vickie Paladino pushed the change and backed removal of the definitions and quotas. The Council vote failed at the full body stage. Safety analysts note the bill "eliminates clear targets and accountability for building a connected, low-stress network and bus priority," and warn it will likely slow mode shift and raise crash exposure for cyclists and pedestrians despite retention of other upgrades.


14
Int 1362-2025 Paladino Backs Misguided Repeal of Protected Lane Definitions

Aug 14 - Int 1362-2025 strips protected bus and bicycle lane definitions and removes lane benchmarks from the Streets Master Plan. It rips out clear targets. Cyclists and pedestrians lose accountability as exposure and crash risk rise.

"The definitions of "protected bicycle lane" and "protected bus lane" ... are REPEALED." -- Vickie Paladino

Int 1362-2025 was introduced on August 14, 2025 and referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The matter is described as "removing benchmarks for bus lanes and bicycle lanes from the streets master plan and repealing certain definitions." Sponsored and advanced by Council Member Vickie Paladino, the bill repeals the definitions of "protected bicycle lane" and "protected bus lane" in Admin Code §19-199.1 and strips lane quotas from the master plan. Removing definitions and benchmarks eliminates clear targets and accountability for building a connected, low-stress network and bus priority. That likely slows mode shift and safety-in-numbers gains, increasing crash exposure for cyclists and pedestrians despite other upgrades.


14
Int 1362-2025 Paladino co-sponsors bill removing bike and bus benchmarks, increasing crash risk.

Aug 14 - Int 1362-2025 strips ‘protected’ bus and bicycle lane definitions and drops lane quotas from the Streets Master Plan. It tears out accountability. Transit priority and safe cycling face rollback. Pedestrians and riders lose clear targets.

Int 1362-2025 was introduced and sponsored by Council Member Vickie Paladino on August 14, 2025, and is in the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The matter is titled, "A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to removing benchmarks for bus lanes and bicycle lanes from the streets master plan and repealing certain definitions in relation thereto." Paladino is the sponsor. The bill repeals the definitions of "protected bicycle lane" and "protected bus lane" and removes lane benchmarks from the Streets Master Plan. Safety analysts say eliminating these definitions and quotas weakens commitments to high‑quality, traffic‑calming, mode‑shift infrastructure and is likely to reduce cycling uptake and bus priority, undermining safety‑in‑numbers and street equity. Status: in committee; no vote yet.


14
Int 1362-2025 Paladino co-sponsors bill removing bus and bike benchmarks from streets master plan.

Aug 14 - Int 1362 repeals the definitions of “protected bicycle lane” and “protected bus lane” and strips explicit benchmarks for protected lanes from the streets master plan. It preserves signal and pedestrian targets but weakens commitments to physical protection, threatening safety and equity.

Bill Int 1362-2025. Status: Sponsorship, introduced Aug 14, 2025. Referred to Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The measure, titled "A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to removing benchmarks for bus lanes and bicycle lanes from the streets master plan and repealing certain definitions in relation thereto," repeals the definitions of "protected bicycle lane" and "protected bus lane" and removes related benchmarks in the master plan (master plan dates referenced include Dec. 1, 2021 and Dec. 1, 2026). Primary sponsor: Robert F. Holden. Co-sponsors: Inna Vernikov, Joann Ariola, Chris Banks, Vickie Paladino. Safety analysts warn: "Removing explicit benchmarks and definitions for protected bus and bicycle lanes weakens commitments to physically protected infrastructure... likely reducing mode shift to walking and cycling and worsening equity and safety-in-numbers; the retained measures focus on signals and pedestrian amenities but do not replace the protective effect of designated protected lanes."


14
Int 1362-2025 Paladino co-sponsors bill to remove bus and bike lane benchmarks, no safety impact.

Aug 14 - Int 1362 strips definitions for protected bus and bike lanes and removes benchmarks from the streets master plan. It guts measurable targets. Safe space for pedestrians and cyclists is at risk. The city could slow needed separated infrastructure.

Bill: Int. No. 1362 (Int 1362-2025). Status: SPONSORSHIP. Committee: Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Event date: 2025-08-14. The matter reads: "A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to removing benchmarks for bus lanes and bicycle lanes from the streets master plan and repealing certain definitions in relation thereto." Council Member Robert F. Holden is the primary sponsor. Joann Ariola and Vickie Paladino are co-sponsors. The draft repeals the definitions of "protected bicycle lane" and "protected bus lane" and removes explicit benchmarks tied to transit signal priority, bus stop upgrades, accessible pedestrian signals and intersection redesigns. Removing those benchmarks weakens commitments to high‑quality separated infrastructure and measurable mode‑shift targets, likely slowing deployment of safe space for pedestrians and cyclists and undermining equitable street redesigns.


14
Int 1362-2025 Paladino co-sponsors bill to remove bus and bike lane benchmarks, no safety impact.

Aug 14 - Int. No. 1362 strips city definitions and benchmarks for protected bicycle lanes and protected bus lanes. It removes targets and accountability. The change will slow deployment of separated bike and bus infrastructure and erode safety and equity for pedestrians and cyclists.

Int. No. 1362 (filed Aug. 14, 2025; stage: SPONSORSHIP) was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The matter is titled "A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to removing benchmarks for bus lanes and bicycle lanes and repealing certain definitions in relation thereto." Council Member Robert F. Holden is the primary sponsor. Co-sponsors are Vickie Paladino, Joann Ariola, and Inna Vernikov. The bill repeals the definitions of "protected bicycle lane" and "protected bus lane" and removes benchmark requirements from the streets master plan. Safety analysts note that removing explicit benchmarks and definitions weakens accountability for building separated cycling and bus infrastructure, likely decreasing street equity and safety-in-numbers for pedestrians and cyclists.


8
Paladino Backs Safety‑Boosting Flood Signage for Unfamiliar Drivers

Aug 8 - Flash floods swamped Cross Island Parkway. Leaders demanded flood signage and storm fixes. Signs may warn drivers but do little for pedestrians and cyclists. Only real infrastructure will cut the risks they face.

Action: infrastructure request (no bill number). Status: public call on August 8, 2025; not advanced to committee or vote. The matter was described as a "call for flood-related street signage and storm mitigation efforts." Queens Borough President Donovan J. Richards called signage a "small step" and "low-hanging fruit." Council Member Vickie Paladino urged signs to warn drivers unfamiliar with the area. State Sen. John Liu pressed city, state and federal agencies and criticized federal funding cuts. Safety analyst note: "Flood warning signage may help alert motorists but does little to address the underlying risks to pedestrians and cyclists... only comprehensive infrastructure improvements would yield significant safety benefits for vulnerable road users."


7
Braunstein Backs Misguided Creedmoor Density Rollback

Aug 7 - City scales back Creedmoor plan. Density cut 27%. The car-free model dies. Walkers and cyclists lose safety and 'safety in numbers'. Local pols beat back bold urban design. Streets stay hostile. The chance for a people-first, low-car neighborhood vanishes.

Bill number: none — this is a policy statement, not legislation. Status: announced August 7, 2025; no committee review. Matter quoted: "NYC Could Have Its First Car-Free Neighborhood (But Won’t Get It Due To Revanchist Pols)." Eastern Queens Greenway condemned the decision to downscale the Creedmoor redevelopment from 2,775 units by 27 percent. Assembly Member Ed Braunstein and Council Member Joann Ariola opposed higher density and pressed the rollback. Empire State Development framed the change as a compromise. Safety impact: the cut reduces potential mode shift, walkability, and "safety in numbers" for pedestrians and cyclists, preserving car dependence and dangerous streets.